This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 72, INZ (Gilray) v Croxson (Peter John Croxson)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 18 October 2019, concerning Peter John Croxson, licence 200900548, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 72
PartiesINZ (Gilray) v Croxson
Decided18 October 2019
Licensed immigration adviserPeter John Croxson, licence 200900548, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / allowing unlicensed people to manage visa application process and unlawfully delegating personal obligations to them / failure to provide clients with written agreement / adviser engaged by offshore immigration consultancy which had been engaged by recruiting agency in another country / adviser’s fee paid by consultancy / adviser had no direct communication with clients / agreement signed by consultancy not clients / all clients’ dealings with unlicensed people / adviser mistakenly believed consultancy was his client / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl17, cl18 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser had no contact with clients whatsoever & left them to deal with unlicensed people whom he did not know / adviser admitted failure to engage with clients and having no written agreement / adviser did engage with file / quality of work not substandard & did not lack care / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 72 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Peter John Croxson (licence 200900548, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Christchurch.

Sources