This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 64, TT v KEN

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 11 September 2019.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 64
PartiesTT v KEN
Decided11 September 2019

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / breach of professional obligations & Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 / failure to engage with client / allowing unlicensed staff to provide immigration services / adviser a contractor for overseas company / agreement with company whereby new clients would be referred to adviser / complainant had no contact with adviser / unlicensed staff met and advised complainant / complainant unsuccessful in obtaining job and sought refund of fees / adviser not aware of complainant until approached for refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl24b, & cl24c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser cannot be responsible for conduct of complainant’s application if he did not know about it / refund not made promptly but complainant never adviser’s client /complaint dismissed.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 64 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources