Ueite Letalu (Itaotemai)
ExpiredFull licenceUeite Letalu held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 200900229, first issued in 2009. The licence is now expired.
Licence details
- Licence number
- 200900229
- Licence status
- Expired
- Licence type
- Full
- First licensed
- 2009
- Licence last issued
- 29 May 2011
- Location
- Auckland, New Zealand
Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.
Register context
Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.
- One of 802 currently licensed advisers based in Auckland.
- The register records 3 filings for this licence between 29 May 2009 and 29 May 2011.
Licence history
Every filing recorded on the register for licence 200900229, newest first.
- Full licence - Renewal · 29 May 2011
- Full licence - Renewal · 29 May 2010
- Full licence - Initial application · 29 May 2009
Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions
Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Ueite Letalu. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — read each outcome; some complaints are dismissed.
- [2015] NZIACDT 109 — M G & N M N v Letalu22 December 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 41 — N v Letalu16 April 2015
- [2014] NZIACDT 93 — Toiloloi v Letalu18 September 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 91 — Fa'asavala v Letalu17 September 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 52 — Toilolo v Letalu15 April 2014
Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record
14 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Ueite Letalu as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.
| Appeal type | Cases | Allowed | Dismissed | Other | Success rate | All appellants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence: partnership | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20%(1 of 5) | 52% |
| Residence: sibling & adult child | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 of 4 | 49% |
| Residence: parent | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 of 3 | 42% |
| Residence: special policies | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 of 1 | 72% |
| Deportation: non-resident | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 of 1 | 37% |
- [2012] NZIPT 200710aResidence: sibling & adult child · 4 September 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200639eResidence: sibling & adult child · 27 August 2012Allowed
- [2012] NZIPT 200679aResidence: sibling & adult child · 24 August 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200631aResidence: special policies · 8 August 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200465aResidence: parent · 30 April 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 500394Deportation: non-resident · 20 April 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200435aResidence: sibling & adult child · 22 March 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200432aResidence: partnership · 7 March 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200366aResidence: partnership · 14 February 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2011] NZIPT 200046aResidence: partnership · 19 May 2011Dismissed/declined
- [2011] NZIPT 200021aResidence: parent · 20 January 2011Dismissed/declined
- [2010] NZIPT 200227aResidence: partnership · 20 December 2010Dismissed/declined
- [2010] NZIPT 16560eResidence: partnership · 27 October 2010Allowed
- [2010] NZIPT 16557aResidence: parent · 18 October 2010Dismissed/declined
This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.
Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.
Before you engage any adviser
- Confirm the licence is Current on the official IAA register.
- Ask for a written agreement setting out services and fees before paying anything.
- Licensed advisers must follow the IAA code of conduct; complaints go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.
Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.