Ueite Letalu (Itaotemai)
- First licensed
- 2009
- Published IPT appeals
- 14
- Appeals allowed, where decided
- 2 of 14
- Licence number
- 200900229
About this licence
Ueite Letalu held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 200900229, first issued in 2009. The licence is now expired.
- Licence number
- 200900229
- Licence type
- Full
- First licensed
- 2009
- Last issued
- 29 May 2011
- Licence status
- Expired
Mirrors the IAA register, refreshed October 2026. If the register and this page differ, the register is right.
Register context
Where this licence sits in the register as at October 2026. Every figure comes from the IAA public register; none is editorial.
- The register records 3 filings for this licence between 29 May 2009 and 29 May 2011.
Immigration and Protection Tribunal record
14 published appealsAllowed 2Other 0Dismissed 12
| Appeal type | Outcomes | Published | Allowed share | All appellants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence: sibling & adult child | 4 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 46% | |
| Residence: partnership | 4 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 54% | |
| Residence: special policies | 3 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 68% | |
| Deportation: non-resident | 1 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 37% | |
| Residence: parent | 1 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 38% | |
| Residence: dependent child | 1 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 57% | |
| All types | 2 allowed, 12 dismissed | 14 | Allowed 14% of 14 |
A percentage shows only where 5 or more appeals were decided. An appeal outcome says as much about the case and which cases are taken on as about the representation.
Appeals by type
14 published appealsAllowed 2Other 0Dismissed 12
| Appeal type | Outcomes | Published | Allowed share | All appellants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence: sibling & adult child | 4 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 46% | |
| Residence: partnership | 4 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 54% | |
| Residence: special policies | 3 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 68% | |
| Deportation: non-resident | 1 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 37% | |
| Residence: parent | 1 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 38% | |
| Residence: dependent child | 1 | Under 5 decided | All appellants 57% | |
| All types | 2 allowed, 12 dismissed | 14 | Allowed 14% of 14 |
Allowed share is allowed appeals out of those decided either way, shown only at 5 or more decided. All appellants is the same share across every published decision of that type. See appeal success rates in New Zealand.
Published decisions
Newest first| Decision | Appeal type | Date | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| [2012] NZIPT 200710aResidence: special policies, September 2012 | Residence: special policies | 4 September 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 200639eResidence: sibling & adult child, August 2012 | Residence: sibling & adult child | 27 August 2012 | Allowed |
| [2012] NZIPT 200679aResidence: sibling & adult child, August 2012 | Residence: sibling & adult child | 24 August 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 200631aResidence: special policies, August 2012 | Residence: special policies | 8 August 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 200465aResidence: sibling & adult child, April 2012 | Residence: sibling & adult child | 30 April 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 500394Deportation: non-resident, April 2012 | Deportation: non-resident | 20 April 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 200435aResidence: sibling & adult child, March 2012 | Residence: sibling & adult child | 22 March 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 200432aResidence: partnership, March 2012 | Residence: partnership | 7 March 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2012] NZIPT 200366aResidence: partnership, February 2012 | Residence: partnership | 14 February 2012 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2011] NZIPT 200046aResidence: special policies, May 2011 | Residence: special policies | 19 May 2011 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2011] NZIPT 200021aResidence: parent, January 2011 | Residence: parent | 20 January 2011 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2010] NZIPT 200227aResidence: partnership, December 2010 | Residence: partnership | 20 December 2010 | Dismissed/declined |
| [2010] NZIPT 16560eResidence: partnership, October 2010 | Residence: partnership | 27 October 2010 | Allowed |
| [2010] NZIPT 16557aResidence: dependent child, October 2010 | Residence: dependent child | 18 October 2010 | Dismissed/declined |
Decisions name the representative by initial and surname only, so a decision is listed only where that name points to this immigration adviser with certainty; this record may be incomplete.
Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions
Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Ueite Letalu. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: read each outcome, as some complaints are dismissed.
- [2015] NZIACDT 109, M G & N M N v Letalu22 December 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 41, N v Letalu16 April 2015
- [2014] NZIACDT 93, Toiloloi v Letalu18 September 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 91, Fa'asavala v Letalu17 September 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 52, Toilolo v Letalu15 April 2014
Licence history
3 filings on the register- Full licence - Renewal29 May 2011
- Full licence - Renewal29 May 2010
- Full licence - Initial application29 May 2009
Before you engage any immigration adviser
Check the licence yourself
The IAA register is the source of truth. This page mirrors it every month.
Ask for a written agreement
The IAA code of conduct requires one, setting out the services and fees, before work starts.
Complaints go to the IAA
The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal hears the complaints referred to it.
Frequently asked questions
Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.