Alungamonu Tangilanu (Laki Monu)
CancelledFull licenceAlungamonu Tangilanu held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 200901832, first issued in 2009. The licence is now cancelled.
Licence details
- Licence number
- 200901832
- Licence status
- Cancelled
- Licence type
- Full
- First licensed
- 2009
- Licence last issued
- 24 September 2010
- Role
- Self employed
- Location
- Auckland, New Zealand
Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.
Register context
Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.
Licence history
Every filing recorded on the register for licence 200901832, newest first.
- Full licence - Initial application · 9 May 2012
Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions
Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Alungamonu Tangilanu. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — read each outcome; some complaints are dismissed.
- [2015] NZIACDT 63 — Talanoa v Tangilanu19 May 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 60 — Samisoni v Tangilanu19 May 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 40 — Talanoa v Tangilanu15 April 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 37 — N v Tangilanu31 March 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 35 — U v Tangilanu23 March 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 15 — Fifita v Tangilanu6 March 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 14 — Pole v Tangilanu3 March 2015
- [2014] NZIACDT 108 — Fifita v Tangilanu3 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 105 — Kaufusi v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 104 — Uia v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 103 — Tukutau v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 102 — Ngalu v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 101 — Tuumotooa v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 100 — Moala v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 98 — A & T Kaufusi v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 97 — Tuitupou v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 96 — Finau v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 95 — Lomu v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 94 — Afemui v Tangilanu1 October 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 76 — Pole v Tangilanu26 August 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 70 — Kaufusi v Tangilanu19 June 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 62 — Uia v Tangilanu30 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 59 — Tukutau v Tangilanu30 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 58 — Ngalu v Tangilanu30 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 57 — Tuumotooa v Tangilanu29 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 56 — Moala v Tangilanu29 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 54 — Kaufusi v Tangilanu24 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 51 — Tuitupou v Tangilanu15 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 50 — Finau v Tangilanu15 April 2014
- [2014] NZIACDT 42 — Lomu v Tangilanu31 March 2014
- [2012] NZIACDT 28 — TG v Tangilanu15 June 2012
- [2012] NZIACDT 18 — Williamson v Tangilanu8 May 2012
- [2012] NZIACDT 17 — TG v Tangilanu8 May 2012
- [2012] NZIACDT 13 — Williamson v Tangilanu28 March 2012
- [2012] NZIACDT 11 — TG v Tangilanu27 March 2012
Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record
4 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Alungamonu Tangilanu as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.
| Appeal type | Cases | Allowed | Dismissed | Other | Success rate | All appellants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence: parent | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 of 2 | 42% |
| Residence: partnership | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 1 | 52% |
| Residence: sibling & adult child | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 1 | 49% |
- [2011] NZIPT 200222eResidence: partnership · 22 September 2011Allowed
- [2011] NZIPT 200287aResidence: parent · 2 September 2011Dismissed/declined
- [2011] NZIPT 200143dResidence: sibling & adult child · 8 April 2011Allowed — returned to INZ
- [2009] NZIPT 16077eResidence: parent · 27 February 2009Allowed
This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.
Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.
Before you engage any adviser
- Confirm the licence is Current on the official IAA register.
- Ask for a written agreement setting out services and fees before paying anything.
- Licensed advisers must follow the IAA code of conduct; complaints go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.
Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.