Aftab Ahmed Syed (Aftab)

Aftab Ahmed Syed held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 201000400, first issued in 2010. The licence is now expired.

Licence number

201000400

Licence status

Expired

Licence type

Full

First licensed

2010

Licence last issued

28 January 2016

Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.

Register context

Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.

• The register records 5 filings for this licence between 5 March 2010 and 28 January 2016.

Licence history

Every filing recorded on the register for licence 201000400, newest first.

1. Full licence - Initial application · 28 January 2016
2. Full licence - TTMRA application · 21 July 2014
3. Full licence - TTMRA application · 10 June 2013
4. Full licence - TTMRA application · 5 April 2012
5. Full licence - TTMRA application · 5 March 2010

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

1 published decision of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Aftab Ahmed Syed as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

• [2014] NZIPT 201386aResidence: skilled migrant · 28 February 2014Dismissed/declined

This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.