This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

LCRO 38/2019 and 151/2019, Yuri Lukas v ZE (Yuri Lukas)

A decision of the Legal Complaints Review Officer, decided 30 January 2020, concerning Yuri Lukas.

The Legal Complaints Review Officer's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerLegal Complaints Review Officer
CitationLCRO 38/2019 and 151/2019
PartiesYuri Lukas v ZE
Decided30 January 2020
Immigration lawyerYuri Lukas, Antaris Limited

What the decision found

The Legal Complaints Review Officer confirmed a Standards Committee's finding of unsatisfactory conduct against Yuri Lukas in a work visa matter, and all of its orders: censure, a fine of $1,500, compensation of $930, cancellation and refund of his fees, and costs of $1,200. The review also confirmed the Committee's direction that his name be published.

The published summary

“Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / immigration application / complaint lawyer did not act in a timely manner, charged fees that were more than fair and reasonable, and that their practice did not preserve the reputation of the legal profession / fee complaint / client overpaid invoice / Committee ordered publication of name / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9 / HELD / instructing solicitor does not appear to have been involved in relationship between client and lawyer / Standards Committee directed to investigate instructing solicitor and overpayment of invoice issue / section 209(1) / lawyer achieved nothing of value for client / publication order confirmed / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a). (See also minute dated 30 October 2019)”

Legal Complaints Review Officer, LCRO 38/2019 and 151/2019 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The immigration lawyer in this decision

This decision concerns Yuri Lukas, listed in this directory as an immigration lawyer at Antaris Limited. A historical finding is not a statement about current standing: the Law Society register shows whether Yuri Lukas holds a current practising certificate.

Sources