This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2026] NZIACDT 51, ZI v Suzuki (Yoko Suzuki)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 7 September 2026, concerning Yoko Suzuki, licence 201100958, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2026] NZIACDT 51
PartiesZI v Suzuki
Decided7 September 2026
Licensed immigration adviserYoko Suzuki, licence 201100958, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 and cl31a / adviser signed a declaration form and an employment agreement in the client and the employer’s name without authority to do so / breach of cl1 and cl31a / adviser was not dishonest and had no intention to defraud, deceive or lie / signatures were not presented in a deceptive way and given in typed script / however, the documents were plainly misleading being presented to Immigration NZ as documents purportedly signed by the client and his employer / adviser careless or negligent but not dishonest / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2026] NZIACDT 51 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Yoko Suzuki (licence 201100958, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources