The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2026] NZIACDT 40 |
| Parties | NM v Nantes-Bautista |
| Decided | 30 June 2026 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Josenia Bautista Nantes, licence 201601189, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions / adviser gave incorrect advice on eligibility for residence / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl17c, cl18b, cl26b / five breaches of four obligations / most serious was fundamental mistake concerning visa criteria / adviser admits wrongdoing / first appearance before Tribunal / adverse publicity of limited relevance to sanctions / further training unnecessary, noting commitment to ongoing professional development and remedial actions / censured and fined $3,000 / ordered to pay $5,690 refund for wasted fees / compensation refused, claimed costs not caused by wrongdoing, emotional damages refused”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Josenia Bautista Nantes (licence 201601189, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.