The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2026] NZIACDT 38 |
| Parties | BM v Nantes |
| Decided | 24 June 2026 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Josenia Bautista Nantes, licence 201601189, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3a, cl3c, cl14, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl22, cl26aiii, cl26aiv, cl26av, cl26b, cl26c, cl26d, cl26e / breach of cl1 and 26b / adviser failed to send critical communications from Immigration NZ to client / failed to exercise due care, did not follow Immigration NZ’s process to obtain required documentation despite being repeatedly informed of it / breach of cl2e / failed to carry out client’s instruction to withdraw application / breach of cl17b / although client provided with a copy, failed to explain summary of professional standards / breach of cl18b / failed to explain significant matters in the service agreement / breach of cl26c / failed to confirm in writing material discussions with the client / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Josenia Bautista Nantes (licence 201601189, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.