This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges — if you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

immigrationadviser.co.nz

[2026] NZIACDT 36INZ (Watson) v Wan (Jiale Wan)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 11 June 2026 · adviser: Jiale Wan

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3a, cl3c, cl14, cl18b, cl20, cl26b, cl26c / breach of cl1/ adviser failed to give clients an opportunity to review visa applications prior to filing / success of application not relevant / breach of cl2e / failed to personally and directly obtain instructions from clients regardless of authority to engage with agent / breach of cl18b / failed to explain all significant matters in agreement to clients / breach of cl26b / failed to confirm in writing when application lodged / breach of cl26c / failed to confirm material discussions in writing to clients / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Jiale Wan (licence 201200703, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.