This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2026] NZIACDT 2, NO v Ellis (James Ellis)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 15 January 2026, concerning James Ellis, licence 201300730, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2026] NZIACDT 2
PartiesNO v Ellis
Decided15 January 2026
Licensed immigration adviserJames Ellis, licence 201300730, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / dviser failed to confirm in writing discussions with client relating to incomplete financial evidence / adviser unprofessionally communicated with tertiary institute following decline of student visa, taking potentially damaging gratuitous ‘swipe’ at client once engagement was terminated / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26c / two breaches of Code / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / low overall gravity of wrongdoing / adviser accepted disciplinary findings and has since introduced improvements in practice to record and confirm material discussions in writing / adviser cautioned and fined $1,000”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2026] NZIACDT 2 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns James Ellis (licence 201300730, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources