This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2026] NZIACDT 16, NN v Registrar of Immigration Advisers

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 10 March 2026.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2026] NZIACDT 16
PartiesNN v Registrar of Immigration Advisers
Decided10 March 2026

The Tribunal's published summary

“Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / immigration lawyer alleged adviser used copyrighted materials from third party organisations in contractual terms and conditions and various professional practice documents published on his website / Registrar rejected complaint under s 45 as there was no evidence of potential copyright infringement / Authority did not believe it nor Tribunal were correct organisations to make determinations as to copyright infringement / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s442 / potential breaches of copyrighted materials without consent do not fall within statutory definition of immigration advice / no client nor immigration matter / matters fall outside statutory complaint and disciplinary process / matters may be investigated as part of considering fitness of person for licensing albeit not be subject of complaint / immaterial that copyright holders have not complained or commenced proceedings in other fora / appeal rejected”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2026] NZIACDT 16 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources