[2025] NZIACDT 44 — SC v Wharekura (Philip Leslie Wharekura)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 28 August 2025 · adviser: Philip Leslie Wharekura

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Professional responsibilities and professional practice / misleading behaviour / follow instructions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl 1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl19e, cl19h, cl19i, cl19k, cl19l, cl19m, cl19n, cl22, cl26aiii, cl26aiv, cl26b, cl26c, cl26d / misled client about seeking reconsideration of declined application / failed to pass on to client, or respond to, requests for information from INZ / failed to provide draft residence application for review / also did not provide decline letter in timely manner or retain all INZ communications on file / failed to follow instruction to remove partner from application / failed to provide or explain professional standards and complaints documents / written services agreement lacked many Code requirements / did not confirm material discussions in writing / did not provide invoice for fees, disbursements / did not maintain well-managed file / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.