The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2025] NZIACDT 34 |
| Parties | KU v Wang |
| Decided | 24 June 2025 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Bin Wang, licence 200902240, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl14, cl18a, cl18b, cl26c / no evidence of failing to obtain and carry out complainant’s instructions or ‘rubber stamping’ / delegation of work permissible where other licensed adviser identified in written services agreement / unlicensed employee able to perform clerical work / however, adviser, as director of company, entered into services agreement with consultancy firm, rather than client / tripartite contractual relationship resulted in lack of services agreement between adviser and client / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / failed to explain all significant matters in agreement / failed to confirm in writing all material discussions / global fixed fee not unfair or unreasonable / alternative negligence heads dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Bin Wang (licence 200902240, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.