This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2025] NZIACDT 34, KU v Wang (Bin Wang)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 24 June 2025, concerning Bin Wang, licence 200902240, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2025] NZIACDT 34
PartiesKU v Wang
Decided24 June 2025
Licensed immigration adviserBin Wang, licence 200902240, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl14, cl18a, cl18b, cl26c / no evidence of failing to obtain and carry out complainant’s instructions or ‘rubber stamping’ / delegation of work permissible where other licensed adviser identified in written services agreement / unlicensed employee able to perform clerical work / however, adviser, as director of company, entered into services agreement with consultancy firm, rather than client / tripartite contractual relationship resulted in lack of services agreement between adviser and client / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / failed to explain all significant matters in agreement / failed to confirm in writing all material discussions / global fixed fee not unfair or unreasonable / alternative negligence heads dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2025] NZIACDT 34 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Bin Wang (licence 200902240, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources