[2024] NZIACDT 3 — MT v Murthy (Nirmala K Murthy)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 11 January 2024 · adviser: Nirmala K Murthy

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Diligence and due care / confidentiality / professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4a, cl19a, cl19i, cl24a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26c, cl26d / HELD / breach of cl1 / admits submitting incomplete and incorrect documents to INZ / no breach of cl4a / sending other clients’ files to Authority during investigation not a breach of confidentiality / breach of cl19a / admits failing to write in service contract name and licence number of second adviser who gave advice / breach of cl19i / admits failing to set out payment terms in contract / breach of cl 24a / admits refund clause not compliant with Code / breach of cl25b, cl25e, cl25f / admits failing to keep advance payment in separate client account and using it for private purposes / breach of cl26aiii, cl26c, cl26d / admits failing to keep file notes, confirm material discussions and maintain well-managed file system / no breach of cl26b / evidence shows regular communication with client / complaint upheld

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.