The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2024] NZIACDT 23 |
| Parties | FM v Yang |
| Decided | 3 September 2024 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Xi Yang, licence 201901289, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17a, cl18b, cl22, cl23, cl26b and cl26c / HELD / adviser permitted an unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / Tribunal rejected license’s suggestion that complainant had sought exclusive communication through agent / in any event, complainant’s authorisation would not usurp adviser’s statutory duties / adviser contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated / however, no evidence of illegitimate commission received by adviser / failed to directly provide invoice and receipt to complainant / did not confirm in writing to the client when visa application was lodged and approved / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Xi Yang (licence 201901289, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.