This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2024] NZIACDT 23, FM v Yang (Xi Yang)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 3 September 2024, concerning Xi Yang, licence 201901289, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2024] NZIACDT 23
PartiesFM v Yang
Decided3 September 2024
Licensed immigration adviserXi Yang, licence 201901289, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17a, cl18b, cl22, cl23, cl26b and cl26c / HELD / adviser permitted an unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / Tribunal rejected license’s suggestion that complainant had sought exclusive communication through agent / in any event, complainant’s authorisation would not usurp adviser’s statutory duties / adviser contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated / however, no evidence of illegitimate commission received by adviser / failed to directly provide invoice and receipt to complainant / did not confirm in writing to the client when visa application was lodged and approved / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2024] NZIACDT 23 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Xi Yang (licence 201901289, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources