This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2024] NZIACDT 14, SC v Murthy (Nirmala K Murthy)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 23 April 2024, concerning Nirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2024] NZIACDT 14
PartiesSC v Murthy
Decided23 April 2024
Licensed immigration adviserNirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Negligence / diligence and due care / professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Act 2009, s150 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9, cl17a, cl17b, cl26aiii / HELD / negligence and breach of cl1 and cl9 / adviser failed to recognise complainant ineligible for visa and application was futile / failed to advise complainant in writing of futility and obtain written consent to proceed / failed to request client file / no breach of cl17a and cl17b / service agreement refers to expired version of Code / adviser provided copy of current Code on same day after signing agreement / failure to provide copy of Code prior to signing only minor breach of cl17b / no evidence adviser did not explain professional responsibilities to complainant / no breach of cl26aiii / call with INZ helpdesk not a material communication / no evidence of meeting or phone discussion with complainant / complaint partially upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2024] NZIACDT 14 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Nirmala K Murthy (licence 200901453, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources