[2024] NZIACDT 14 — SC v Murthy (Nirmala K Murthy)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 23 April 2024 · adviser: Nirmala K Murthy

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Negligence / diligence and due care / professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Act 2009, s150 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9, cl17a, cl17b, cl26aiii / HELD / negligence and breach of cl1 and cl9 / adviser failed to recognise complainant ineligible for visa and application was futile / failed to advise complainant in writing of futility and obtain written consent to proceed / failed to request client file / no breach of cl17a and cl17b / service agreement refers to expired version of Code / adviser provided copy of current Code on same day after signing agreement / failure to provide copy of Code prior to signing only minor breach of cl17b / no evidence adviser did not explain professional responsibilities to complainant / no breach of cl26aiii / call with INZ helpdesk not a material communication / no evidence of meeting or phone discussion with complainant / complaint partially upheld

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.