The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2023] NZIACDT 26 |
| Parties | BL v Registrar |
| Decided | 10 October 2023 |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint adviser made misleading claim about contacting INZ, had no authority to work on complainant’s behalf, gave incorrect advice, and communicated poorly with complainant / Registrar rejected complaint on basis it did not disclose any statutory grounds of complaint / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451, s54 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl16, cl18, cl19b / HELD / file evidences breach of cl1 / adviser gave incorrect advice on material matter that complainant could be issued second interim visa / adviser’s obligations continued when complainant asked for authority form and contract / adviser’s emails show evidence of unprofessional communications / other heads of complaint not established / appeal allowed”