This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 26, BL v Registrar

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 10 October 2023.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 26
PartiesBL v Registrar
Decided10 October 2023

The Tribunal's published summary

“Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint adviser made misleading claim about contacting INZ, had no authority to work on complainant’s behalf, gave incorrect advice, and communicated poorly with complainant / Registrar rejected complaint on basis it did not disclose any statutory grounds of complaint / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451, s54 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl16, cl18, cl19b / HELD / file evidences breach of cl1 / adviser gave incorrect advice on material matter that complainant could be issued second interim visa / adviser’s obligations continued when complainant asked for authority form and contract / adviser’s emails show evidence of unprofessional communications / other heads of complaint not established / appeal allowed”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 26 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources