This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 11, SM v Kim (David Kim)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 6 April 2023, concerning David Kim, licence 200901996, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 11
PartiesSM v Kim
Decided6 April 2023
Licensed immigration adviserDavid Kim, licence 200901996, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser bundled recruitment and immigration services together, and failed to appreciate professional obligations would apply to recruitment services / written agreement did not set out full description of recruitment services or fees / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl19e, cl19f / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / breaches were an honest mistake, and adviser acknowledges wrongdoing and has learned a lesson / it is important that written agreement covers entire services and specifies the fee / size of the fee ($18,805) is a material factor, but the client was advised of the fee before signing agreement / adviser censured / ordered to pay $500 financial penalty in light of acknowledgement and clean disciplinary record”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 11 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns David Kim (licence 200901996, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources