This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2022] NZIACDT 5, LS v Murthy (Nirmala K Murthy)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 4 April 2022, concerning Nirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2022] NZIACDT 5
PartiesLS v Murthy
Decided4 April 2022
Licensed immigration adviserNirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Failure to confirm matters in writing / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26b, cl26f, cl28a / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s5, s7, s442, s49 / HELD / jurisdiction / work on NZQA qualification assessment was immigration advice as a necessary document for a residence visa / oral hearing / complainant did not attend hearing / allegations of dishonest or misleading behaviour not upheld / adviser’s evidence she was authorised to create email address for complainant plausible, accepted / adviser’s evidence she stopped work after seeing message terminating services, accepted / no breach of cl 1 for failing to lodge assessment in a timely manner, work was not urgent / no breach of cl26f for failing to provide documents when requested, statement of complaint does not identify what documents were subsequently provided or not / breaches of cl26b & cl28a for failing to confirm in writing when NZQA assessment application was lodged, and when services were terminated / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2022] NZIACDT 5 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Nirmala K Murthy (licence 200901453, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources