The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2022] NZIACDT 27 |
| Parties | ZK v Li |
| Decided | 8 November 2022 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Hao Li, licence 201600184, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Unprofessional / failure to confirm in writing details of material discussions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9, cl26aiii & cl26c / adviser did not confirm oral advice regarding risks in writing / cl26c is not a trivial bureaucratic obligation, oral advice is not always fully appreciated and written advice allows reflection / other grounds of complaint not established / alleged failure to recognise and advise complainant of risks contradicted by evidence / no missing written communication or file notes identified by the Registrar / complaint upheld”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Hao Li (licence 201600184, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.