This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2022] NZIACDT 18, TQ v Gibson (Sharon Anne Gibson)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 25 July 2022, concerning Sharon Anne Gibson, licence 201800725, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2022] NZIACDT 18
PartiesTQ v Gibson
Decided25 July 2022
Licensed immigration adviserSharon Anne Gibson, licence 201800725, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Diligence and due care / adviser failed to reply to PPI letter or inform complainant their application was declined / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s7, s442, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26a / HELD / adviser did not engage with Tribunal / breaches of cl1 / lack of professionalism, diligence and due care in failing to substantively respond to PPI letter, compounded by not obtaining urgent instructions after being reminded by INZ / failure to inform complainant of application outcome, or reply to complainant’s emails regarding work visa and residence application, also constitute breaches of cl26a / dishonesty or misleading conduct allegation not upheld, as adviser did not know of decline decision before being told by complainant / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2022] NZIACDT 18 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Sharon Anne Gibson (licence 201800725, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Hamilton.

Sources