This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2022] NZIACDT 1, ZI v Wan (Jiale Wan)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 January 2022, concerning Jiale Wan, licence 201200703, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2022] NZIACDT 1
PartiesZI v Wan
Decided19 January 2022
Licensed immigration adviserJiale Wan, licence 201200703, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Diligence and due care / client breached visa conditions by travelling offshore twice without their child while holding a guardian visitor visa / visa required that client live with their child in NZ / first trip involved a family emergency / adviser failed to lodge a separate variation application, instead relying on immigration officer’s failure to object while questioning departure / second trip was to gather evidence for residence visa application / adviser failed to inform client that INZ refused a temporary exemption to visa condition, or warn of consequences of departing in breach / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / breach of cl1 found / adviser accepts he should have made formal variation application, and should have informed client of adverse decision and advised of risks and options / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2022] NZIACDT 1 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Jiale Wan (licence 201200703, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources