This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2021] NZIACDT 1, HQT v Singh (Inderpal Singh)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 15 January 2021, concerning Inderpal Singh, licence 201301110, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2021] NZIACDT 1
PartiesHQT v Singh
Decided15 January 2021
Licensed immigration adviserInderpal Singh, licence 201301110, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / rubber stamping / adviser failed to engage with complainant or his partner & left it to his staff to communicate with them / adviser involved behind the scene but absented himself completely from client relationship concerning substantive immigration work / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / complaint related to only one client / adviser made an effort to learn from experience & improve business practices / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / adviser censured & ordered to pay $1000 penalty.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2021] NZIACDT 1 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Inderpal Singh (licence 201301110, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources