This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 6, NL v Joseph (Ashar Joseph)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 31 January 2020, concerning Ashar Joseph, licence 201400225, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 6
PartiesNL v Joseph
Decided31 January 2020
Licensed immigration adviserAshar Joseph, licence 201400225, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Negligence / lodging of falsely signed documents / absence of client agreement & proper file documentation / adviser offered complainant work for company he had an interest in / owner not aware of offer / adviser claimed to be acting on behalf of owner & instructed staff member to sign offer letter & employment agreement as owner / post-study work visa declined as employment agreement not valid / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl18a, cl26, 31a / conduct unprofessional but not negligent / adviser presented documents with false signatures / adviser instructed staff member to sign as owner rather than on behalf of owner / failure to inform owner not a mere oversight as adviser could have informed him / adviser failed to enter client services agreement / omission not a mere technicality or file management issue / adviser failed to properly document services / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 6 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Ashar Joseph (licence 201400225, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources