A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2020] NZIACDT 40 |
| Parties | NZQA (Seavor-Cross) v Jin |
| Decided | 25 September 2020 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Oulu Jin, licence 201700957, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions decision / dishonest or misleading behaviour / adviser fabricated academic document & filed it with NZQA to speed up client’s application / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / form of document false not content / fact adviser not motivated by personal gain a mitigating factor / isolated act & adviser promptly admitted wrongdoing / adviser censured & ordered to pay $2,500 penalty.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Oulu Jin (licence 201700957, current). See the full licence history on their profile.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.