This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 24, BV v Aiolupotea (Salesa Aiolupotea)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 12 June 2020, concerning Salesa Aiolupotea, licence 201401503, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 24
PartiesBV v Aiolupotea
Decided12 June 2020
Licensed immigration adviserSalesa Aiolupotea, licence 201401503, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Negligence / dishonest or misleading conduct / failure to correctly advise client of eligibility for citizenship & provide proper documentation / adviser undertook to seek visitor visa and citizenship for complainant / no work done towards citizenship application & no documents on file despite charging fee / visitor visa declined / complainant not informed visa declined or that he was ineligible for citizenship / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl19, cl26, cl27 / adviser’s unexplained lack of proper file documentation, failure to advise complainant of eligibility & acceptance of fee dishonest / adviser failed to produce full file, provide full description of services & confirm oral advice in writing / adviser negligently failed to return family’s original documents to complainant / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 24 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Salesa Aiolupotea (licence 201401503, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources