This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 17, XA v Hill (Jennifer Ann Hill)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 10 March 2020, concerning Jennifer Ann Hill, licence 201600511, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 17
PartiesXA v Hill
Decided10 March 2020
Licensed immigration adviserJennifer Ann Hill, licence 201600511, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / facilitating immigration advice by unlicensed person / application for residence / complainant had no contact with adviser & exchanged messages with her unlicensed partner / adviser claimed she dictated messages to partner & he was merely performing clerical work / credibility issues / incorrect information provided to INZ as to complainant’s work experience / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl18c / adviser did not personally engage with complainant / adviser absent from written communications & meetings / complainant unaware adviser real author of messages & led to believe adviser’s partner responsible for application, not adviser / insufficient evidence partner gave advice / adviser engaged with application & was real author / adviser’s responsibility to check application correct / adviser failed to exercise due diligence & care / adviser failed to have written client agreement / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 17 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Jennifer Ann Hill (licence 201600511, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources