The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2020] NZIACDT 17 |
| Parties | XA v Hill |
| Decided | 10 March 2020 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Jennifer Ann Hill, licence 201600511, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Rubber stamping / facilitating immigration advice by unlicensed person / application for residence / complainant had no contact with adviser & exchanged messages with her unlicensed partner / adviser claimed she dictated messages to partner & he was merely performing clerical work / credibility issues / incorrect information provided to INZ as to complainant’s work experience / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl18c / adviser did not personally engage with complainant / adviser absent from written communications & meetings / complainant unaware adviser real author of messages & led to believe adviser’s partner responsible for application, not adviser / insufficient evidence partner gave advice / adviser engaged with application & was real author / adviser’s responsibility to check application correct / adviser failed to exercise due diligence & care / adviser failed to have written client agreement / complaint upheld.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Jennifer Ann Hill (licence 201600511, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.