This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 14, Singh v Ryan - Sanctions

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 27 February 2020.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 14
PartiesSingh v Ryan - Sanctions
Decided27 February 2020

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / providing false & misleading information / adviser ran scam supplying fake job offers to clients from paper companies he controlled / complainant knowingly received fake job offer & granted work visa on that basis / complainant claims refund of fees & compensation for leaving NZ / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser’s misconduct most serious warranting severest level of sanctions / adviser main perpetrator of scheme / conduct sustained, deliberate & brought regime into disrepute / adviser driven by greed, admitted no wrongdoing & showed no remorse / fraud not an isolated incident / compensation figures inaccurate, inconsistent & not supported by documentary evidence / complainant willing party to adviser’s fraud & not entitled to compensation / neither adviser nor client should benefit from fraud / adviser censured / adviser prevented from reapplying for licence for 2 years / adviser ordered to pay $10,000 penalty & $4,535 refund of fees.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 14 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources