This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 12, TSO v Essina (Olga Anatolievna Essina)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 27 February 2020, concerning Olga Anatolievna Essina, licence 201001902, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 12
PartiesTSO v Essina
Decided27 February 2020
Licensed immigration adviserOlga Anatolievna Essina, licence 201001902, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / dishonest or misleading conduct / acting unprofessionally / adviser withheld complainant’s NZQA assessment from INZ / adviser misrepresented to complainant why earlier visitor visa declined / adviser offered refund money for withdrawal of complaint / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser’s conduct dishonest / adviser deliberately deceived INZ & client / limited acknowledgement of wrongdoing / dishonesty not of worst kind / compensation claimed / not shown decline of visa arose from adviser’s wrongdoing / adviser censured / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / adviser prevented from renewing licence for 1 year / adviser ordered to pay $4000 penalty & $1298 for refund of fees.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 12 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Olga Anatolievna Essina (licence 201001902, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources