This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 10, INZ (Carley) v De'Ath (Benjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 February 2020, concerning Benjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath, licence 201401414, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 10
PartiesINZ (Carley) v De'Ath
Decided19 February 2020
Licensed immigration adviserBenjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath, licence 201401414, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Unprofessional and disrespectful communications with INZ / INZ initially declined client’s work visa / adviser sent emails to immigration officers expressing concern & criticising INZ / INZ made complaint that adviser’s communications were antagonistic, intimidating & not in proportion to issue / Immigration Advisers licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 / adviser’s correspondence unprofessional but did not cross disciplinary threshold / adviser’s remarks about officers not malicious or offensive / some truth to adviser’s criticism & frustration understandable / criticism of public officials an important aspect of professional practice / complaint dismissed.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 10 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Benjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath (licence 201401414, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Hamilton.

Sources