This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 82, DKD v Smith (Gregory Francisco Smith)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 12 December 2019, concerning Gregory Francisco Smith, licence 201100496, refused.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 82
PartiesDKD v Smith
Decided12 December 2019
Licensed immigration adviserGregory Francisco Smith, licence 201100496, refused

The Tribunal's published summary

“Failure to inform complainant in timely manner invitation for residence application issued / failure to submit residence application before invitation expired / negligence / failure to provide complainant with written agreement / residence visa application / adviser lodged expression of interest / INZ issued invitation to adviser but adviser did not contact complainant about it until 1 month before expiry / adviser advised application would be delivered but undertook no further work so application and invitation expired / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl 18a / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / no denial of allegations by adviser / adviser negligent / conduct fell well below standard of reasonable care of competent and professional licensed adviser / adviser failed to provide written agreement / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 82 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Gregory Francisco Smith (licence 201100496, refused). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources