The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2019] NZIACDT 69 |
| Parties | INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz |
| Decided | 7 October 2019 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Maria Socorro Angela Ortiz, licence 201200057, refused |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions decision / failure to establish professional relationship with client / providing false information to INZ / dishonest & misleading conduct / adviser’s licence suspended / criminal convictions for exploiting unlawful employee / client had work visa for farm work but instead worked as a hairdresser at adviser’s salon / client not paid for work / adviser told INZ client was a volunteer & asked client to write a letter to INZ to that effect / INZ did not give permission for client to work at salon / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c, cl18a, cl26b / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / providing false information most serious complaint / adviser already punished by Court for criminal convictions / gravity of complaint warranted adviser being censured / not necessary to consider cancellation as adviser prohibited from holding licence due to convictions / adviser had low income and two children / adviser censured & ordered to pay penalty of $3,500.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Maria Socorro Angela Ortiz (licence 201200057, refused). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Christchurch.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.