This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 61, INZ (Gilray) v Singh (Harinder Singh)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 3 September 2019, concerning Harinder Singh, licence 201300776, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 61
PartiesINZ (Gilray) v Singh
Decided3 September 2019
Licensed immigration adviserHarinder Singh, licence 201300776, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / delegation of client engagement to an unlicensed person / adviser dealt with clients through overseas consultancy / adviser had no direct engagement with clients and allowed unlicensed person to provide immigration advice / adviser treated employer as main client / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl26b / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / professional violations serious / conduct an isolated incident - arose from one set of instructions and one critical mistake / adviser accepted misconduct and need for engagement / misconduct not deliberate or dishonest/ breaches arose from adviser’s misunderstanding as to who real clients were / adviser censured and ordered to pay penalty of $3000.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 61 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Harinder Singh (licence 201300776, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources