This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 53, INZ (Gilray) v Singh (Harinder Singh)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 29 July 2019, concerning Harinder Singh, licence 201300776, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 53
PartiesINZ (Gilray) v Singh
Decided29 July 2019
Licensed immigration adviserHarinder Singh, licence 201300776, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / Breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 / delegating immigration work to unlicensed staff / adviser dealt with clients through overseas consultancy / adviser had no contact with clients / clients dealt with unlicensed staff member throughout / clients completed checklist / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, 3c, 18b, 19e and cl26b / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser thought clients’ employer who paid his fee was his main client / adviser relied on unlicensed people to assist clients / immigration advice embraces all immigration work / inevitable staff member would give unlicensed advice / highly likely clients would ask questions and issues would arise / adviser unprofessional and failed to exercise care / failure to obtain clients’ informed instructions / complaint serious / clients denied protection of engaging with a qualified and knowledgeable person / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 53 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Harinder Singh (licence 201300776, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources