This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 49, XN v Ji (Yan Ji)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 July 2019, concerning Yan Ji, licence 201100562, cancelled.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 49
PartiesXN v Ji
Decided19 July 2019
Licensed immigration adviserYan Ji, licence 201100562, cancelled

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 / application for residence visa / adviser did not directly engage with client / adviser allowed unlicensed staff to do work of licensed adviser/ agreement between client and company / adviser an employee of company / all client’s communications with employees of another company in different countries / residence visa declined / adviser sent decline letter to employee / client’s IPT appeal out of time / date of INZ decline letter sent to client had been changed / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl 18a / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s50 and s51 / work of employees fell within definition of immigration advice / adviser failed to directly obtain instructions from client / Code does not require adviser to be a party to the agreement or to sign it / Code only requires adviser to be named / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 49 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Yan Ji (licence 201100562, cancelled). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources