The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2019] NZIACDT 27 |
| Parties | Van Zyl v McNeil |
| Decided | 8 May 2019 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Netta Temamaeroa Maria Mcneil, licence 201501100, expired |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Immigration adviser in breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / four heads of complaint alleged / misleading or dishonest conduct / s442d of the Act / failure to pay refund promised / failure to maintain all communications in required manner / failure to provide written communications for inspection / Code of Conduct 2014, cl24b & cl24c, cl26aiii and cl26e / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / insufficient evidence of dishonest or misleading conduct / adviser failed to promptly provide promised refund / adviser breached written agreement with complainant / sufficient record of communications with clients existed / complaint upheld.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Netta Temamaeroa Maria Mcneil (licence 201501100, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.