This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2018] NZIACDT 51, INZ (Foley) v De'Ath (Benjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 December 2018, concerning Benjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath, licence 201401414, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2018] NZIACDT 51
PartiesINZ (Foley) v De'Ath
Decided19 December 2018
Licensed immigration adviserBenjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath, licence 201401414, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / unprofessional conduct / adviser alleged immigration officer provided false and misleading information / adviser also alleged officer cover-up of wrongdoing and intention to disadvantage migrants / no evidence to substantiate formal complaints / correspondence amounted to personal attacks / Immigration Advisers’ Code 2014, cl1 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / unprofessional and disrespectful to make complaints of serious misconduct without evidence in support / adviser apologised to one officer but not the other / no malice and adviser showed remorse / officers must expect criticism and be robust/ adviser cautioned and ordered to pay penalty of $750”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2018] NZIACDT 51 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Benjamin Neil Stewart De'Ath (licence 201401414, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Hamilton.

Sources