This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2018] NZIACDT 48, Wang v Denekamp (Stephen Hendrik Denekamp)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 23 November 2018, concerning Stephen Hendrik Denekamp, licence 201500335, surrendered.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2018] NZIACDT 48
PartiesWang v Denekamp
Decided23 November 2018
Licensed immigration adviserStephen Hendrik Denekamp, licence 201500335, surrendered

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / adviser failed to engage with complainant as a fully committed professional / adviser failed to have written agreement with complainant / adviser had no personal contact with complainant but certified he had / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser did not recognise warning signs of rubber stamping / isolated incident / no compensation as claim lacked nexus with complaint & inadequate proof of quantum / adviser prevented from reapplying for licence until training completed / adviser censured & ordered to pay $4,500 penalty & refund fee of $300 to complainant”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2018] NZIACDT 48 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Stephen Hendrik Denekamp (licence 201500335, surrendered). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources