A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2011] NZIACDT 16 |
| Parties | Cheema v Lepcha |
| Decided | 20 June 2011 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Chheogyal Jah Om Sandyang Lepcha, licence 200900896, cancelled |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Substantive decision. Complaint upheld.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Chheogyal Jah Om Sandyang Lepcha (licence 200900896, cancelled). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.