This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2025] NZIACDT 41, KU v Wang (Bin Wang)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 1 August 2025, concerning Bin Wang, licence 200902240, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2025] NZIACDT 41
PartiesKU v Wang
Decided1 August 2025
Licensed immigration adviserBin Wang, licence 200902240, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / four professional obligations breached / adviser failed to enter services agreement directly with complainant / failed to explain all significant matters in agreement / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / failed to confirm in writing details of all material discussions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl14, cl18a, cl18b, cl26c / failure to have agreement personally with complainant a major departure from expected standards / moderate overall gravity of offending, reflecting one serious breach and three others / adviser accepts wrongdoing and has taken comprehensive steps to prevent repetition / first complaint upheld in 16 years of practice / adviser censured / ordered to pay $2,500 financial penalty”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2025] NZIACDT 41 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Bin Wang (licence 200902240, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources