[2025] NZIACDT 41 — KU v Wang (Bin Wang)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 1 August 2025 · adviser: Bin Wang

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Sanctions / four professional obligations breached / adviser failed to enter services agreement directly with complainant / failed to explain all significant matters in agreement / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / failed to confirm in writing details of all material discussions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl14, cl18a, cl18b, cl26c / failure to have agreement personally with complainant a major departure from expected standards / moderate overall gravity of offending, reflecting one serious breach and three others / adviser accepts wrongdoing and has taken comprehensive steps to prevent repetition / first complaint upheld in 16 years of practice / adviser censured / ordered to pay $2,500 financial penalty

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.