[2025] NZIACDT 40 — KM v Jiang (Sanctions)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 31 July 2025

The tribunal's published summary

Sanctions / adviser failed to directly communicate or engage with client (‘rubber stamping’), breaching eight professional obligations / client a victim of immigration fraud / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl26ai, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26d / direct engagement a fundamental obligation of advisers, failure enabled immigration fraud to occur / gravity of wrongdoing at upper end of moderate / third complaint in eight years of practice / adviser acknowledges wrongdoing and expresses remorse / further training unnecessary given appreciation of wrongdoing / formal prevention of adviser reapplying for licence unnecessary / adviser censured / financial implications of all sanctions decisions considered / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty /

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.