This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2025] NZIACDT 23, JY v Wen (Xinru Wen)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 25 March 2025, concerning Xinru Wen, licence 202100205, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2025] NZIACDT 23
PartiesJY v Wen
Decided25 March 2025
Licensed immigration adviserXinru Wen, licence 202100205, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser breached nine professional obligations / client wound up as a victim of immigration fraud / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl14, cl17a, cl17c cl18a, cl18b, cl20a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / Tribunal denounces failure to have written agreement before undertaking work, along with excessive fee and numerous other breaches of Code / three complaints upheld against adviser, treated as first appearance / Tribunal accepts adviser was inexperienced, only holding provisional licence at time of breaches / moderate gravity of wrongdoing / adviser offered no apology, though acknowledges significance of wrongdoing and has taken comprehensive steps to prevent repeat / adviser has implemented practices to prevent repeat and regularly undertakes professional development / further training unnecessary / adviser censured / compensation not sought / adviser ordered to pay $3,000 financial penalty”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2025] NZIACDT 23 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Xinru Wen (licence 202100205, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources