This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2024] NZIACDT 20, LB v Luv (Kay Luv)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 8 July 2024, concerning Kay Luv, licence 201300983, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2024] NZIACDT 20
PartiesLB v Luv
Decided8 July 2024
Licensed immigration adviserKay Luv, licence 201300983, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser did not inform complainant of futility of residence visa application / no written acknowledgement from complainant of such advice / charged excessive fee / failed to maintain consistent communication with complainant / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl9, c24, c26 / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / misconduct towards lower end of moderate level / no apology to complainant / adviser failed to accept that she had failed to inform complainant of lack of eligibility / nonetheless demonstrated level of acceptance of Tribunal’s findings / acknowledged valuable lesson to be learned / no training required / no need to denounce misconduct / adviser cautioned / ordered to pay $3,500 financial penalty / ordered to pay $6,810 refund / compensation of $29,000 refused as no evidence that claimed expenses causally related to adviser’s wrongdoing”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2024] NZIACDT 20 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Kay Luv (licence 201300983, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources