This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2024] NZIACDT 19, SC v Murthy (Nirmala K Murthy)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 21 June 2024, concerning Nirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2024] NZIACDT 19
PartiesSC v Murthy
Decided21 June 2024
Licensed immigration adviserNirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser failed to recognise complainant’s ineligibility for visa / failed to obtain complete file before application / failed to recognise that visa application was futile and to obtain complainant’s written consent / failed to conduct oneself with professionalism, diligence and due care / negligence / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9 / HELD / sixth appearance before Tribunal / moderate to serious gravity of offending in totality / wrongdoing occurred prior to training directed by Tribunal arising from separate proceedings / adviser commended for new extensive systems introduced to reduce risk of ‘paperwork’ offending / demonstrated insight into failings by taking practical steps to improve processes / further training not necessary / notwithstanding lack of apology, threshold for suspension not met / adviser censured / ordered to pay $6,000 financial penalty / ordered to pay $4,660 in compensation and refund”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2024] NZIACDT 19 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Nirmala K Murthy (licence 200901453, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources