This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2026] NZIACDT 12, TS v Registrar of Immigration Advisers

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 23 February 2026.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2026] NZIACDT 12
PartiesTS v Registrar of Immigration Advisers
Decided23 February 2026

The Tribunal's published summary

“Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint adviser misled appellant by stating he was eligible for NZ job market, overestimating eligibility for resident visa / complaint adviser deceived him into believing that being “eligible” for resident visa would enable him to secure employment / complaint adviser did not provide clear, documented advice about limits of eligibility / complaint regarding job search dismissed as undertaken by a different person in a different company under a separate contract / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s442 / appellant misunderstood advice provided by adviser / adviser did not communicate he was entitled to such visa / adviser explained that further steps would “enhance” eligibility / rejection from employers due to lack of work visa is a reflection of job market / regulatory breaches discovered did not justify disciplinary action / appeal rejected”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2026] NZIACDT 12 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources