[2025] NZIACDT 6 — DH v Liu (Jiaxian Liu)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 14 January 2025 · adviser: Jiaxian Liu

The tribunal's published summary

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of licence / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide complete record of communications / breach of cl26aiii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.