The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2025] NZIACDT 46 |
| Parties | LN v Rabuku |
| Decided | 4 September 2025 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Rosi Rabuku, licence 202000733, expired |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl22, cl24a, cl24b, cl24c, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26a, cl26c, cl26d, cl26e, cl28a, cl28c / adviser failed to respond to client’s text messages and was dilatory in filing visa application / visa application filed more than five months after ascertaining required information / did not advise client she could no longer act following expiry of provisional licence / proceeded to file application despite expiry of licence / did not provide fair refund upon termination of services / failed to maintain separate client account / appropriated client’s monies, failing to use them only for fulfilment of services while licensed / failed to maintain records / filing system not well-managed / did not confirm all material discussions in writing / corresponding negligence heads dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Rosi Rabuku (licence 202000733, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Christchurch.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.