[2025] NZIACDT 46 — LN v Rabuku (Rosi Rabuku)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 4 September 2025 · adviser: Rosi Rabuku

The tribunal's published summary

Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl22, cl24a, cl24b, cl24c, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26a, cl26c, cl26d, cl26e, cl28a, cl28c / adviser failed to respond to client’s text messages and was dilatory in filing visa application / visa application filed more than five months after ascertaining required information / did not advise client she could no longer act following expiry of provisional licence / proceeded to file application despite expiry of licence / did not provide fair refund upon termination of services / failed to maintain separate client account / appropriated client’s monies, failing to use them only for fulfilment of services while licensed / failed to maintain records / filing system not well-managed / did not confirm all material discussions in writing / corresponding negligence heads dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.