[2025] NZIACDT 31 — LY x Jiang

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 16 June 2025

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Professional responsibilities and professional practice / rubber stamping / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl26ai, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26d / adviser failed to maintain direct communications with client, could not communicate through unlicensed agent / breach of fundamental obligation to personally contract with and engage with visa applicant / adviser contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated / failed to provide evidence of licence / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / failed to retain visa application and records of communications / availability of visa application from INZ website immaterial to obligation to maintain records / however, no evidential foundation to indicate conflict of interest / alternative negligence heads dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.