The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2024] NZIACDT 26 |
| Parties | QN v Nandan |
| Decided | 12 November 2024 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Rupika Nandan, licence 201401377, surrendered |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions / adviser failed to disclose in writing a conflict of interest to employee complainant and consequently did not obtain written informed consent to continued representation / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl5, cl6 / HELD / complainant aware of existence of conflict but may not have appreciated implications of conflict / adviser unable to provide independent advice to employee / gravity of wrongdoing properly assessed as lower end of moderate / adviser cooperated with Authority and Tribunal / adviser disputed breach at hearing but since expressed appreciation of wrongdoing / second appearance before Tribunal / previous complaint of limited relevance / adviser no longer practicing as immigration adviser, but consumer protection interests support need for general deterrence / claim for compensation failed to establish damages or losses arose due to complainant’s misconduct / adviser censured / ordered to pay $2,500 financial penalty”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Rupika Nandan (licence 201401377, surrendered). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Hamilton.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.